FeedaMail: Comments for Sutter’s Mill

	Comments for Sutter's Mill
	(Sponsor this newsletter) Comment on Reader Q&A: Why was implicit int removed? by somedude While I think this is a good change which will improve readability without sacrificing to much flexibility, the int type is still special in some circumstances, for example when doing arithmetic operations on smaller-than-int types the operands are upconverted to int first. Read More » Comment on A quick poll about order of evaluation… by Aaron If I didn’t know any better, I would assume the following based off of the OOO. v[i++] = i++; // Just evaluating this expression. v[i++] // place address of v[0] on the stack, increment i (i == 1); i++ // load i (i == 1) on the stack, increment i (i == 2); = // pop the value 1 from the stack, pop address of v[0] from the // stack, assign v[0] the value of 1; I would expect an output of 10. Read More » Comment on A quick poll about order of evaluation… by somedude I hope the result of the voting isn’t undefined. Read More »
	(Sponsor this newsletter)
	Delievered to you by Feedamail. Unsubscribe