FeedaMail: Comments for Sutter’s Mill

	Comments for Sutter's Mill
	(Sponsor this newsletter) Comment on Visual C++ Compiler November 2013 CTP by Aaron Sorry I haven’t found a better place/way to ask but… Is there (or can there please be) a plan for standard C++ *process* synchronization? I’m thinking something like Windows’ Mutex (cross-process, create locked, released by OS on process termination), but supporting shared locking as well. Read More » Comment on Visual C++ Compiler November 2013 CTP by pachesantiago Can somebody give me an example of how await/resumable work? I cant find any example that compiles Read More » Comment on Visual C++ Compiler November 2013 CTP by JC_Yang @Aaron: I haven’t read the C++ standard through, but IIRC, process as a term does not exist in the standard. One C++ program as a whole running in the abstract machine described by the standard might be somehow resemble a process, but still, it’s not process. So adding any cross-process/multi-process stuff require significant change in the standard, wording, terms…etc and many subtle details. Yes, I’d like to see some standardized IPC library, too. but probably not in the near future afaik. Read More » Comment on Visual C++ Compiler November 2013 CTP by JC_Yang @Aaron: forget to mention Boost::Interprocess, it probably can help you atm. Read More »
	(Sponsor this newsletter)
	Delievered to you by Feedamail. Unsubscribe