FeedaMail: Comments for Sutter’s Mill

	Comments for Sutter's Mill
	(Sponsor this newsletter) Comment on GotW #7a: Minimizing Compile-Time Dependencies, Part 1 by Norm It appears something is drastically removing things from peoples comments. A lot of them are saying remove #include and nothing after. like this To the includes: #include #include Read More » Comment on Perspective: "Why C++ Is Not 'Back'" by Bob There is currently a higher demand for programmers than can be filled. I am guessing 9 out of every 10 job postings do not require knowledge of c++ or c and only expect training in a gc’d language like c#/java/python etc. So given this metric I’d agree with John that you don’t “need” it unless you really want to pursue a field that demands it’s low evel/latency. Secondly with Moores law approaching an end a low energy intensity language like c++ only becomes more valuable as embedded devices become more and more ubiquitous in our daily lives. I hope the c++ standards committee considers this and supports additions that are ‘light’ and most importantly safe as lives will depend on code correctness. Read More »
	(Sponsor this newsletter)
	Delievered to you by Feedamail. Unsubscribe