FeedaMail: Comments for Sutter’s Mill

	Comments for Sutter's Mill
	Comment on GotW #5 Solution: Overriding Virtual Functions by Róbert Dávid I hope I don’t :) I just want to point out (to Herb) that instead of the verbosity of auto pb = unique_ptr{ make_unique() }; I find it better to have a guideline to use auto if there is no conversion during initialization, and write the type if there is. Or rephrasing: Use auto whenever you can, write the type only if you must. (“meh” is no english word, try to read it with some disapproval in your voice :) ) Read More » Comment on Lost two comments by David Dillard You might also want to check you RSS feed, some of the links (but not all of them) are incorrect. For example, there’s an entry for http://herbsutter.com/2013/05/22/gotw-6a-const-correctness-part-1-2 when it should be http://herbsutter.com/2013/05/24/gotw-6a-const-correctness-part-1-3/. Read More » Comment on C++ and Beyond: My material for December, and early-bird registration (through June 9) by nosenseetal @herb C++14 will be implemented that fast because there is much less to implement. :) Excuse my selfishness but I would be happy if poor compiler devs :) had years of work for C++14 (ofc if it was to implement nice features, not broken stuff). But again this is totally off-topic, my advice was just to tone down the C++14 while advertising because IMO ppl will take you more seriously. C++11 IMO still hasnt been “mapped out” totally so Im sure there is plenty of C++11 topics ppl would like even if you never mentioned C++14 Read More » Comment on GotW #6b: Const-Correctness, Part 2 by Justin Simon muxecoid: ret is a copy of, not a reference to, lhs. When you’re using auto you still need to specify a reference qualifier (&) if that’s what you want Read More » Comment on C++ and Beyond: My material for December, and early-bird registration (through June 9) by Brian M Any change to a standard only becomes usable when its fully supported, otherwise it’s not a ‘real’ standard, just wishfull thinking! Adding another change before 11 meets a ‘real’ standard level of adoption is just plumb silly! Makes one wonder if some of the HTML5 standards people have migrated to c++ :) Read More » Comment on GotW #5 Solution: Overriding Virtual Functions by Why initialize unique_ptr with a make_unique call? | BlogoSfera […] Taken from: http://herbsutter.com/2013/05/22/gotw-5-solution-overriding-virtual-functions/ […] Read More »
	Delievered to you by Feedamail. Unsubscribe