| ||||
 Comment on Trip report: Summer ISO C++ standards meeting (Oulu) by Herb Sutter
@GregM: I don’t know of a writeup of the reasons, but even though no variation of defaulted comparisons has got consensus yet, people are still noodling over alternatives that might. @Mark: I like LEWG would welcome such a proposal. Check out https://isocpp.org/std/submit-a-proposal for details. @Marcin: Yes, they’d need to have access. @Fabio: Yes, the order of evaluation guarantees fix the f(new T, new T) bug that make_unique was a workaround for today. See the link in that section. @admin: Yes, that should be {x.c}. Fixed, thanks. @Sebastian: Nested bindings were deliberately excluded from the initial proposal but might be added later. @Andy: We won’t need the make_* helper for the purpose of type deduction, but in cases likemake_shared where they do more than just deduce the helper will still be needed for the additional non-deduction functionality. Read More »Comment on CppCast interview about the Oulu ISO C++ meeting by Mehrdad
It was an awesome interview to listen. Read More » | ||||
| | ||||
| ||||
Monday, July 4, 2016
FeedaMail: Comments for Sutter’s Mill
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)