| ||||
 Comment on Reader Q&A: "Will C++ remain indispensable…?" by pjmlp
Bartosz Milewski seems to have another opinion, http://bartoszmilewski.com/2013/09/19/edward-chands/ Read More »Comment on Reader Q&A: "Will C++ remain indispensable…?" by Herb Sutter
@pjmlp: Yes. He is smart and a good guy, but so negative that I wonder whether we were at the same conference. He’s welcome to his opinion, and many people have said the same; but I don’t share it, and I disagree with most of his examples. Two particular things he’s wrong about involve compatibility: 1. He underestimates the importance of source backward compatibility. It’s extremely important, see here: http://herbsutter.com/2012/12/04/compatibility/ 2. He overestimates the complexity cost of source backward compatibility. It isn’t as high or important as he thinks. I’ll talk about this on Tuesday night in Chicago at the Chicago C++ Users Group meeting: https://sites.google.com/a/chicagoacm.org/chicago-chapter-of-the-acm/meeting-topics/2013-09-24-onec-herb-sutter (Note it says the event is at capacity, but they’re looking for a bigger room, so do add yourself to the waiting list.) Read More »Comment on Bjarne and I are speaking in Chicago on Tuesday night by Tom Kirby-Green
Will the talk be filmed and available later online Herb? Kind regards, Tom Read More »Comment on Bjarne and I are speaking in Chicago on Tuesday night by Al capone
Acccording to figures last week, that is the murder capital of gthe U.S. Read More »Comment on Bjarne and I are speaking in Chicago on Tuesday night by Petro
Can we expect video recordings later? Thanks in advance. Read More » | ||||
| | ||||
| ||||
Friday, September 20, 2013
FeedaMail: Comments for Sutter’s Mill
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)